TAHIR JAMIL BUTT versus JEHANGIR PERVEZ
Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 R7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3), 199 and 212 (3) Inquiry proceedings rejected by the inquiry officer Constitutional petition against the rejection order The Departmental Inquiry was underway and he did not appear before the Inquiry Officer on two dates. The Inquiry Officer, finding an excuse for lameness, concluded that the applicant's absence was deliberate and under R7. Action was taken against the applicant, Government servants (Performance and Discipline), In 1973, the Inquiry Officer filed The Rea review application was rejected on the ground that they did not have the power to review and that the applicant was negligent and the constitutional application against the order of the inquiry officer was rejected by the High Court that it was under the jurisdiction of the High Court. Above the option The jurisdiction contained in the Article 212 (1973) to intervene in the matter, and the matter relating to the enforcement of the terms and conditions of service and the appeal for the case was able to be maintained by the Service Tribunal High Court, in these circumstances. The order approved by the inquiry officer in the investigation process was rightly denied. Supreme Court refuses to appeal against High Court verdict
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Shahdad Kot lawyer