Find a Lawyer

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus MUHAMMAD TARIQ PIRZADA

Establishment of Office of Delegation Ombudsman Order 1983, 1983 Arts 11 and 32 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The nature of the functions performed by the content represents the representation of the President of Pakistan against the order of content governance. The candidate, who was eligible for the C-Section Competitive Examination, approached the designation of one of the District Management Group's posts for vacancy, but his request was rejected and the candidate related to the authority's order. And filed a complaint after thorough scrutiny of the material available to the content. The hearing parties recommended that the candidate was entitled to consider a position of the District Management Group, which was not recommended by the Ombudsman, by the Constitutional Petitioner, to resolve his complaint. Had approached the High Court. Before the end of the ombudsman, which was approved by the President of Pakistan without the use of a fair mind and without giving any reason, the justification for the execution of the diligence was naturally judicial, suggested by him or his The results entered could not be arbitrarily separated, without giving any valid reason for writing them. Representation under Article 32 of the Office of Federal Ombudsman Order, 1983, because nothing was stated in this Article that President Pakistan could pass, without assigning any reason, when dealing with representation. criminal advocate from Chaghi lawyer