HUMAYUN ZAIDI versus HUSSAIN AFROZA
For the specific performance of the Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 suit agreement, the defendant, a lawyer and other defendant's co-accused were executed by themselves and other defendants on behalf of themselves and other defendants as power of attorney. Based on the options given, the home was contracted for sale. For the specific performance of the contract filed by the plaintiff / vendor, they were resisted in the suit in favor of the other defendants who were alleged to have canceled the execution of the attorney in favor of the attorney / vendor. Has been negotiated, cannot be contracted with a salesperson through a lawyer. Has been executed on the basis that the defendants / vendors had entered into a sale agreement with the claimant / seller after the sale agreement was executed, executing the defendant / lawyer in favor of entering the sale agreement The attorney had full authority. The other defendants / shopkeepers were later executed by other defendants. The transaction has already been done by the lawyer because the other defendants are bound by Dodd / Attorney as donors of power for their lawyer. That they performed in accordance with the terms of authority granted by the Power of Attorney.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Upper Dir lawyer