FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION, CABINET SECRETARIAT, ISLAMABAD versus NOOR AHMED KHAN
Martial Law Regulation 1972 No. 115 Para 29 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application by auto-amendment jurisdiction The Federal Land Commission intervened in its constitutional jurisdiction by the High Court in dispute with the owner of the land. In the statement filed by him under the Reform Regulations, 1972, the transaction of sale showed all the sales transactions made by him from 1 3 1967 to 20 12 1971, the Deputy Land Commissioner said. It was held that the Commissioner was appointed by the Land Commissioner as well as the Additional Chief Land Commissioner, as a matter of law and order of the deputy. , But the Federal Land Commissioner to determine the scope of the amendment itself has been the rule, saying undo transactions and authorities have been directed to the owner / vendor court entitled to their constitutional jurisdiction. Leaving aside the Federal Land Commissioner's order with no legal solution has no legal effect on fitness and on a twofold basis. First, the Federal Land Commissioner, through his office, cannot interfere with or interfere with the exercise of his own power under paragraph 29 of the Land Reform Regulation 1972. And second, Regulation 29 of the Land Reforms Regulation, 1972, declared that the provisions relating to the qualifications were conscientious to the integration of Islam when Qazilbash Waqf vs. Chief Land Commissioner, Punjab, Lahore PLD 1990 SC 99, of the legitimate Federal Land Commissioner. Was reported in use. Paragraph 29 of the Land Reforms Regulation 1972, in its own jurisdiction, reviewed the ownership, accuracy and legality of the orders passed by the authorities below.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
