Find a Lawyer

GHAZALA ISMAT HASSAN KHAN SABRI versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 185 (3) The Educational Institution Identifying Response Books In its constitutional petition, a leave application for appeal of the Deal Condition Petition / Candidate was filed before the High Court so that its reply books were re-marked. Be done. According to the university's comment, the re-marking could not be ordered since they were destroyed, but according to the High Court order, the numbers were re-checked in the presence of the applicant for which he applied for a candidate. Had not raised any objection. The leave to appeal, which was banned for 144 days, claimed that the university did not double-check the answer books, but they only re-counted the numbers on the page titled Counter-Books. The facts raised by the petitioner needed to be investigated which could not be directed in the proceedings. Before the 144-day delay in filing leave for appeal to the Supreme Court, it will be condolenced by the applicant that it will cause serious injury to the accident, She remained in the hospital for medical treatment, the applicant did not say anything about the delay in her request for condolences, as she was allegedly injured and for how long she remained in the hospital, and the applicant provided her Did not accept responsibility. Record the documentary evidence requested by them for the delay of any documentary evidence; the clarification offered by the applicant not to approach the Supreme Court within time, was confused. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Hasilpur lawyer