MUHAMMAD ASIF versus STATE
Section 302 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 382B Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) From the re-examination of the evidence, the benefits of Section 382B, CRPC were not available on the grant record. Suggest enmity. Eye witnesses were present between the parties to falsely implicate the accused in a malicious case; eye witnesses did not face any difficulty in identifying the attacker during the day's incident, The role of the accused in this case fits perfectly with the medical evidence, at the request of the defendants from the deserted place, the ocular testimony was confirmed, being the only injury case, no reason to replace the assailant. Was not, however, in the absence of any misrepresentation and deliberation or lack of appreciation by the courts. , No basis for interference was made by the Supreme Court decisions of the courts below remained silent on the delivery of benefits. 382B, CR PC held that the petition for leave to appeal the accused was rejected
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Topi lawyer
