MUHAMMAD MUMTAZ KHAN versus SECRETARY, FORESTS AND TOURISM, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT, MUZAFFARABAD
Respondents made clear decisions regarding illegal appointments to initiate contempt proceedings in Article 3, S&7 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, VIII of 1974 (VIII of 1974). What was infringing. The Supreme Court, but through them the same was canceled and the errors were corrected to the dignity of the court, so in three different stages the respondents filed ineligible waivers and they themselves were at the mercy of the respondents. And put it on the worm. Presumably attending the court in all the history for the hearing to show that they have placed the judiciary with the highest respect, with the purpose of preserving the dignity of the court. What was to be used, the unforgivable amnesty of the respondents was accepted accordingly and not acted upon.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Kamalia lawyer
