Find a Lawyer

ZAHAR HUSSAIN SHAH versus SHAH NAWAZ KHAN

The appreciation of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 evidence and the FIR that it has received resulted in a fabricated story and in such a fact the prosecution's story was highly skeptical, especially But eyewitnesses related to the victim had a previous grudge against them. The suspect, who was allegedly stopped by the party on the cattle route, was assisted by the prosecution in the light of the Medico legal report and prepared by Patwari to make his statements in the Medco Legal Report. Sitemap was checked. The prosecution's story was skeptical because his statement did not support the investigation or the injury sheet produced by the investigating officer in the Medicaid Legal Report, so it was not of much importance. The trial court was not allowed to present the report of Franzik expert with evidence. For example of the accused, the crime was recovered, the police in custody who had taken the weapon to the specialist without sufficient explanation through the evidence had not been presented as a witness. On the indictment the story of the recovery of the offensive weapon was waged, the delay in sending the specialist to show the attempt to change the evidence in these circumstances would lead to interference with the prosecution, minor witnesses The evidence was not credible, because according to the infighting, one of the witnesses reported the case and The poll was not fair. The other was a close relative of the victim, especially when unseen lawer from fb area from Orakzai lawyer