Find a Lawyer

NAZAR MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 457/34 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 9/14 Appeal Forum, Report of the Complainant's Commitment to Provide a Law was not mentioned Under which the alleged crime has been committed. It was punishable under it. In the challan of conviction under section 457/380, the PPC was referred to. Yes, the trial court had alleged that they only had to stand trial. Not under section 7457/34, PPC and section 808080, PPC which provided for theft conviction and only under section 45/7 / under by the sessions court convicted and sentenced The appellant against the PPC said the defendants, who were tiled before the Federal Shariat Court, were prosecutors. Objection to its retention If a court did not have jurisdiction to prosecute it, he would have mistakenly accepted it and did not exercise the powers contained therein and the judge passed the judgment. Consequently, an appeal from this decision will lie in the same manner as an appeal against the impugned order of the Sessions Court would be lied to, so it was not qualified before the Federal Shariah Court. And he was removed. Lemon accordingly Pakistan, top advocate family court from Lakki Marwat lawyer