Find a Lawyer

SOHAIL HAMEED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Request for Review of Sections 24 (a) and 24 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203E Reactions to the Inclusion of the Purpose of Islam and Sections 24 (a) and 24 (b), the Pakistan Army Act 1952 Is allowed though it is required. His mission is always to be steadfast in the performance of his mission, despite his efforts and efforts, he is sometimes forced to do so in a situation that may not seem ideal but requires strategic importance, operational. Was also by agencies or by order. Other Conditions Requirements (a) and (b) Section 24 of Section 24 of the Pakistan Army Act 1952 was, in fact, the fulfillment of such circumstances and this phrase was used as "shameful" with good intention and complete knowledge. As included in it. In order to arrive at the correct conclusions, the appropriate phrase / shame is not only correctly placed in the above sections so that it is easy to clarify every act of the Commission or its definition of supporters. In the context of prior to the recording of the conviction or acquittal of any officer of the Armed Forces, who may be charged with any of the actions mentioned above, but it is important that the clause referred to in Section 24 In the questions of ) And 24 (b) of the Pak Army Act 1952 did not in any way offend the integration of Islam, nor was it sufficient to entertain the request for revision of the revolt from the Quran and the Sunnah, even without merit. The review request was dismissed accordingly famous high court advocate from Samundri lawyer