Find a Lawyer

ABDUL WAHEED versus STATE

Prohibited (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article Article 3 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), the witnesses to recover the value of Section 103 evidence were not only the police constables but also belonged to the patrolling party headed by Section H who had complained to himself. Worked as a donor. And in this case, the investigating officer committed a violation of the provisions of section 103, CR PC, even though the investigating officer did not have time for this purpose to exclude respectable persons from the location in the recovery process. Was. Evidence of a curable prosecution was outrageous It was alleged that as an active member of the press, he was writing columns condemning the bureaucracy and politicians in harsh language, indicating that the policemen were molested. That the accused's father's crime, whether proven or not, should not be entrusted to the suspect for the fact that he was a drug addict who had been acquitted on the charge of circumstantial benefit. law firms from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer