Find a Lawyer

TAJAMUL KHAN BANGASH versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION GULZAR HIJRI, DISTRICT MALIR, KARACHI

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 199, 23 and 24 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 550 Constitution Petition Police officer was charged with arresting the applicant and returning this earlier constitutional petition filed against the said police officer. On refusing to take it, he drove his car forward. And others denied the allegation that the police had seized the car under Section 5050, CRPC, for failure to present its registration documents, before the applicant. The constitutional application was in the knowledge of the police officer. On the day he arrested the applicant and surrounded his car, police could not show whether the accused was involved in a crime or stolen property or that the applicant was stopped during routine checkups. I was brought to the police station. Officers acted maliciously and could not illegally request a constitutional petition b. The applicant for an alternative action with the intention of maintaining his or her abuses on a technical basis cannot be retained because of the presence of the department. Police officer's failure to report the seizure to the magistrate in violation of the mandatory provisions of 550, the PCP itself declared such occupation illegal, the petitioner claimed to have purchased the vehicle and for more than three months Despite the passage, no one came forward to claim the same petitioner, thus the police The car was entitled to act in the custody of law for the use of the applicant officer Constitution of Arts 23 and to lose your car Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kech lawyer