Find a Lawyer

STATE versus MUNAWAR ALI TALPUR

Accountability Act 1997 Section 3 Sindh Government Rules of Business, 1986, R 19 Minister, Municipal Government of Sindh, had contracted the other accused with an octree of Rs. 20,00,000 at a fixed price of Rs. The result was a loss of Rs. Accused (Minister) of the State Treasury must repeal three times in the RX (A) of the notification dated 10, 1996 issued by the Government of Sindh, Local Government / Health, despite opposition by 32.44,000. The procedure is violated. The Secretary of Defense was taken by the accused (Minister) that he was neither aware of the procedure nor aware of it by the Secretary, because there was no excuse for not knowing the law. The minister was expected to be the municipality's minister. The law and procedure under which he had to operate and under R 19 of the Sindh Government Rules of Business 1986 he was responsible for matters relating to his department Town of Two. Related Committee, Other Accused: The boy did not justify illegally recommending the Octroi deal, ignoring the imperative requirement of the RX (a) to provide three times for the restoration of the prosecution, Beyond the shadows, it is suspected that the (Minister) and the Town Officer were corrupt and corrupt, and similarly, the Contractor was also guilty of wrongdoing by the Contractor under Section 3 of the Accountability Act 1997 Who had illegally obtained legal benefits in the league and in the collusion with the accused (minister), As a result, the Accountability Act has been convicted under Section 3 of the 1997 and sentenced accordingly. advocate from Zhob lawyer