Find a Lawyer

JEWAN BUKHSH versus FAZAL AHMED

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Sections 40 and 13 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Decision of Distribution Procedure Relating to Trial Decision and Trial The decision was rejected. Through the appellate court, the claim that the plaintiff was not entitled to a hearing in the division proceedings before the assistant collector, even if he had applied for an inclusion, said that the plaintiff claimed that the assistant collector had made the distribution. It was instructed to restrict what was left behind. With regard to the map alias, the separation of Khatas, the copy of which was available, the reduction in holding of about half of the plaintiff's disputed land cannot be protected as the first appeals court and the High Court did. And these requests should have been allowed to keep it all. They had bought their predecessor at interest. That the trial court correctly ruled on the claim of the Revenue Authorities that it was obliged to challenge the invalid orders under section 9, CPC, and the High Court's decision on the principle of termination of the case. Cannot be retained. The court will consider such dispute by the plaintiffs / applicants famous supreme court advocate from Manoabad lawyer