Find a Lawyer

NAZEER AHMED DHOON versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

The duties of the Sindh Public Service Commission 1990 Rule 3 and 5 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (J) and 199 Appointment Promotions, the public servants opposed the appointment of Assistant Commissioner of Public Employees in their constitutional petition before the High Court. What was the challenge Instead of an ad hoc basis on a regular basis claiming that the appointments and promotions of public servants should be given by the Sindh Public Service Commission, the government employee's request was dismissed by the High Court and the constitutional application was rejected with the observation that Sindh Public. The R5 (Work) Rules of the Service Commission, 1990 gave the Chief Minister the public interest to specify positions that could be filled without referral to the Public Service Commission, and in the case of opposition from civil servants, the Chief Minister Exercised the powers conferred under the above rules and the positions of assistants Was registered. The Commissioners' Appeal to be Filled Without Referring to the Commission's Accuracy The Supreme Court of the Appeal only subject to the limitation in respect of public servants who were directly involved without scrutiny by the Provincial Public Service Commission. This view was in accordance with the law in favor of the High Court. female advocates from Dhatmal lawyer