Section 279 Proof of raiding or negligent driving repressal allegedly overturned bus and resulted in negligence that it was hit by a car at one point of the road and caused the death of the victims. After the collision, the accused allegedly got off the bus and fled the trial. The court acquitted the accused, however, the High Court ordered the accused to be acquitted under Section 279 of the Indo-Indian Penal Code and sentenced the accused, saying that no witnesses had seen the accused driving the incident. The parade, in the absence of a test identification, had to be held that the accused was not driving nor was he being identified According to the principle of race ipsa loquitur, it could well be estimated that it was a serious There was an accident that happened at a turning point in which a number of people died. After the accident, the bus driver (the accused) took the bus to a different place. Moved. The bus driver had to be properly maneuvered to indicate that he was driving in the right direction, and that the vehicle trying to overtake the other vehicle was on the wrong side of the road. As a result, it happened. This type of accident was a very material situation and the driver's respective behavior. All of the prosecution's witnesses were persistent in saying that the suspect was driving and after parked in the vehicle away from the scene, he fled. The testimony was fully supported by the documentary evidence, the statements of the prosecution witnesses were not serious. Or material contradiction was not found, therefore, they were capable of credibility and no opportunity to deny them.
