VIDUR IMPEX AND TRADERS PVT. LTD. versus TOSH APARTMENTS PVT. LTD.
OI, R 10 (2) and O XXXIX, Rr 1 & 2 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 24 A suit for specific performance related to property required by the proprietor / buyer and appropriate party scope vendor / buyer Finding its application for specific performance by violating a court-approved order. Applicants have been requested for specific performance of the contract to effectively sell to the plaintiff / vendor high court order the injunction restraining order in any way, seizing or dissociating the suit property or It has passed a restraining order prohibiting the creation of a third-party rights, in which the agreement to sell the disputed property in favor of the claimant / buyers (appellant) in violation of the injunction order Goes , Which Transfer Wonders applied to O 1, R 10 (2), applying for CPC, executing contracts to sell it in favor of transfer vendors. The plaintiff's motion for specific performance filed by the plaintiff, as the defendant, resisted the aforementioned application claiming that the transaction between the defendants, vendors and exchanges was illegal and the basis of such transactions. But the vendors did not acquire any right or interest in the suit property; that the seller was not a party to the default sale agreement between the claimant and the defendant; thus, they had no task to counter this claim. , And that the shopkeepers requested transfer after many years of interference with a secret matter It was. The defendant's High Court ordered shopkeepers
