Find a Lawyer

SIKANDAR ALI versus STATE

Pakistan Panel Code Section 5A5A / evidence evidence The testimony of the prosecution was independent of the witnesses of the evidence and fully supported the version given in the FIR, all witnesses of the prosecution were examined at length by the defense lawyer but The facts of the prosecution's testimony were faithfully inspiring, and their version was not available in the evidence, as well as confirming the confession of the accused and the investigating officer, so that one could say that the prosecution The witnesses were outraged with the accused, or they reluctantly relayed the alleged delay in filing the FIR What it did and did not explain, it seems that the accused's judicial confession is convincing and justifiable in cases related to the crime which the relevant magistrate recorded after completing all the necessary rituals, he voluntarily proved. And it was confirmed by the testimony that at their point of abduction and the evidence of the abducted people was permanently paid for the payment of the salary, and they were free from doubt that there was no enmity between them and neither the prosecution's witnesses nor Any notice of minor contradictions and contradictions that falsely accused the evidence of the alleged kidnappers does not prove all of this evidence false. The dog that would otherwise have been the trust of the prosecutor. Without any reasonable doubt, the accused proved their case against the accused, the accused were rightly punished and sentenced. famous supreme court advocate from Ghari Dupatta lawyer