TAJ ALI ISLAM versus STATE
Proof of Citizenship 2 (a) and 9 of the Foreign Act 1946 has been charged with defining the burden of proof that his citizenship was obtained through any birth, naturalization or migration passport and national ID card, The accused had failed to produce any documentary evidence to prove that the fake documents were not sufficient for the establishment of passport citizenship, otherwise, Iqraba Puri and residents of Pakistan. This path could have been established through the evidence of, which was not the final burden of proof under section 9 of the Foreign Act 1946. To prove the accused was not a foreigner, he failed to exclude the sentence and the accused's sentence was kept under conditions.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Sherani lawyer