Find a Lawyer

LADAK & SONS (PVT.) LTD. versus AVEBE B.A.

Arbitration Act 1940 Section 34 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Articles 42 and 54, Placing the trial arbitration agreement to recover the declaration and money was in this case the proceedings should have been initiated by either party. Agreement against any other party. That efforts should be made to stop legal proceedings in the case of those who disagree. The application for stay must be from a party to legal proceedings in which the stay application must be made before filing a written statement. That the applicants did not take any action in the proceedings after the hearing. And that the applicant was at the beginning of the proceedings, ready and willing to do everything necessary for the proper holding of the arbitration agreement at the earliest opportunity for the defendant to establish proceedings under section 34, the Arbitration Act, 1940. The request for was transferred. An attempt was made to keep the matter in agreement with those who agreed to extradite the arbitrator, in order to prevent the defendants from taking action for discriminatory leave to refuse the application of section 34, the Arbitration Act 1940. No step will be said. Under the circumstances, a stay of action was allowed advocate for immigration from Kallat lawyer