Find a Lawyer

MIR HASSAN versus STATE

Law E-Testimony Order 1984 Article 132 Principles of Examination The purpose of cross-examination is to extract the truth from the witness In order to achieve this objective, cross-examination related issues must be imprisoned which the witness may ask to establish his prejudice. Interested, corrupt or misleading the witnesses should also seek their stand in relation to the dispute or draw attention to their previously contradictory statement of relevant facts, or pay attention to the preceding statements contained therein. This can be inquired into. Investigation on these letters is advancing, the court may allow it to continue, however, it has been found that of late, there has been a tendency in criminal cases, especially among the lawyer, to allow witnesses to carry out lengthy investigations. The questions to scare and scare them by investigating them as irrelevant and misleading are that the court should not remain silent spectator for the right of the cross as the court finds that the question from a witness from a party. The right to cross examination is being abused by asking which is irrelevant and the purpose of extending the cross examination for the purpose of scaremongering only. Is harmful. Intimidating the witness, the court should intervene and refuse such scrutiny. It cannot be ruled out that litigation cases against witnesses hold important positions; it is not possible for the courts to come to a valid conclusion in this case without true witnesses. Therefore, in cases where the courts should be treated with dignity and respect, the witness must be assured that by the party against whom he or she best advocate from Hangu lawyer