NAZEER AHMED DHOON versus GIVERNMENT OF SINDH
Appointment and Appointment of Government Employees Before the High Court Regular appointments and appointments by the Government Employees as Assistant Commissioner Regulations of the Sindh Public Service Commission Rules 1990 RR 3 and 5 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 Appointment Promotion Instead of the Adhoc Foundation, the High Court abolished the arrest of a public servant, claiming that the appointment and promotion of public servants should be done by the Sindh Public Service Commission. And the constitutional application was rejected with the observation that the Sindh Public Service Commission's R5 (Rules, 1990) Empowered the Chief Minister in the public interest to specify positions that could be filled without reference to the Public Service Commission and, in the case of opposition to civil servants, the Chief Minister exercised the powers obtained under the said rules. And removed the positions of assistant. The commissioners should be filled without a valid commission reference. The Supreme Court granted the leave of appeal only subject to the limitation of employees who were directly involved without the provincial public service commission process to examine it. The idea was in accordance with the law in favor of the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Mansehra lawyer