Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD RUSTAM versus MUHAMMAD MALIK


Special Relief Act 1877 Sections 9 and 54 After the Permanent Order of a Prohibition Order, a lawsuit was filed for a permanent injunction to prevent the plaintiffs from forcibly evading the land after the amendment. That during the course of the trial, the defendants forcibly disposed of the plaintiff in a dispute over a substantial portion of the land and that the plaintiff sought an injunction for ownership to the extent that the plaintiff did so through this amended claimant. According to his statement, he has occupied some part of the land in the dispute, there is no question. In his favor an issue of decree for ownership arose, but the remedy was left to the Revenue Authorities in the matter of division of land in the dispute, which he was already treating.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for advocates from Mangla lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.