Find a Lawyer

BASHARAT AZIZ versus DIL JAN

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Courts Act 1993 Section 14 (5) Section 42 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), the family signed an appeal against the Shariat court's decision to appeal the constitutional application for leave. Two cross-family filed suit petitioner filed a restitution of marital rights against the defendant, while the defendant filed a lawsuit against the applicant against the declaration and permanent injunction against the applicant's family. The court did not have a married wife and the case filed by the petitioner was dismissed, but the family court On appeal against the decision of the court, the Shariat Court had filed the family court's findings aside that the petition was granted for leave to appeal against the judgment of the Shariah Court, if the court was satisfied that The applicant's case involves a substantial amount of the case. The question of the law of public importance is not that the Shariat Company, the URT, came to the conclusion that the applicant had failed to prove that the respondents were married by the respondent's father in accordance with Muslim law. It was a question of fact which could not be called a question of public importance, even if the law was involved in this matter, leave could be granted only if the question involved was not only a question of law but also a question of public importance. In such a case, there is no such situation, leave of appeal for appeal has been dismissed lawer from fb area from Akhora Khattak lawyer