Find a Lawyer

AMEERULLAH versus AZAD GOVERNMENT

Azad Jammu and Kashmir regularizes the notarization and grant of land (Amendment) Act 1989 section 3 (2) (4) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), section 42 on fifty years of land for public purpose. Lease Legally the Supreme Court of Appeal challenged the Authority for a public purpose for fifty years of land on the basis that they were continually occupying the land and that they were in possession of the land under their possession. The Appellant's claim that the rights are entitled was rejected by the High Court. Each of his appeals was more than 15 kanals, while a person who was in possession of the land in dispute could be said to have owned less than 8 kanals of land, similar to the High Court's findings. Was neither challenged by the appellants. They did not, on the basis of their appeals filed before the Supreme Court, argued that the calculation of the land held in their area was not properly worked out. The outreach, which was required for any government purpose or joint village purpose, could not be regularized under the provisions of Article 3 (4) of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, regularization of the constellations and the open land (amendment). The Land of 1989 Act is in dispute after the development authority was leased for the purpose of establishing green spots, the appellant's claim was rightly rejected by the High Court. law firms from Doaaba lawyer