Find a Lawyer

AMIRAN BIBI versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN

Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 15 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), S12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The decision of the pre-trial case was decided on 13 10 1985 and an appeal against the decision. Was dismissed by the High Court Plaintiff, meanwhile, under section 12 (2), CPC, so that the decision of the Decree was obtained through fraud and misrepresentation by the Respondent. Alias was barred from filing after a three-year commitment alleging such a request. Under section 12 (2), the CPC does not, in any case, have to follow the framework of the matters, the recording of the record and the procedure laid down for the decision of the suit. The question is whether the matters were to be settled and the evidence of the parties involved in resolving allegations of fraud and misrepresentation will depend. After the full scrutiny of the contents of the record, the facts of each case, consistent with the High Court of Justice, were in favor of which of the defendants' father? The gift of the land under trial was made during the trial, when the court dismissed the case before the trial, which had remained silent for six years and the gift was based on property ownership. The claimant was never contacted by the court. The foremost professional in interest could not be allowed to make any premiums for his conduct. The High Court had recorded the fact that in the interest of the defendants, it was aware of the foregoing litigation, which had been between the parties for a long time. And he was responsible. Judgment by not applying properly within the prescribed time limit jobs for advocates from Hala lawyer