Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL

Government Lands (Punjab) Colonization Act 1912 Section 32/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) illegal occupation of public land by the applicant, the appropriate action taken by the Assistant Commissioner against the applicant on the board of Revenue was up to the Petitioners. The Constitutional Petition was rejected by the High Court on the basis of the material on the record that the applicant in the measles kidney was illegally exposed to the land, therefore, he was in no way an equal and arbitrary jurisdiction. Was not entitled to relief. The court petitioner claims that the Revenue Record had a gross misrepresentation and did not have the appropriate opportunity of hearing to establish his claim, submitted by the petitioner to the measles kidney and relying on his behalf. They clearly indicated that he was taking illegal possession. The land in question, the applicant has failed to show its legal claim on the piece of land, in question, it was not correct The leave to appeal for arbitrary relief was denied in the circumstances. law websites from Choa Saiden Shah lawyer