Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ABDUL SAMAD versus RASHK-E-JEHAN


Cantonment Rent Restrictions Act 1963 Section 17 (4) (b) (ii) Disposal of the Tenant Landlord's Personal Needs Tenant Pre-conditions The landlord must prove that he is in the cantonment area or a local area. Not occupied. Surrounding, in which such building is located, any such building shall be suitable for the purpose of the landlord at the time necessary for the purpose of his business, under which section 17 (4) (b) The Expression Building Restriction Act, 1963, used in the Cantonment Rentals, refers only to the landlord's property but not the tenant building where the tenant in his written statement did not claim that the landlord occupied the landlord's requirements. Enough and the tenant was also unable to demonstrate that the landlord's eviction request was not acceptable. Was given, request removal from the feudal landlords being able to demand their expulsion will be rejected.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Kotla Pathan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.