Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF versus STATE

The provisions of Article 195 (1) (c) and 476 Aids of the Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974 and Section 42 (II) of the Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (1974 VII) appeal to the apex court suit alleging forgery on the documents. Apply. The Plaintiff / Plaintiff / Appellant filed a petition against the Plaintiff / Defendant alleging a trial for possession, that the Plaintiff / Defendant committed a forgery on a land-related contract to damage his suit. The plaintiff / appellant has sought to initiate legal proceedings against the defendant / defendant. But the trial court returned the application for submission to the appropriate forum and the High Court rejected the trial court's order revising that the trial court's order did not face any legal weakness Val ignored the fact below. It was stated that no action could be initiated under it. Plaintiff / Applicant In another forum, in view of the contents of 47 476, the PCP plaintiff / applicant had a case of holding a fraudulent commission in connection with the land documents, the case of the plaintiff / appellant under section 195, The CRPC and the court should have taken action under CRPC, 5 5 476, if after the inquiry, the trial court or the result will come. In proceeding in the matter is beneficial in the interest of justice, 5 476, CR should be made a complaint under the PCC clause and the question is whether it is not the case by the court whether the case is liable to be filed or any other. This has to be resolved by the court as well. The Supreme Court, while accepting the appeal, set aside the orders along with the courts below and re-filed the petitioner's request. best law firm from Dera Ismail Khan lawyer