Find a Lawyer

BAQA MUHAMMAD KHAN versus CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY, AZAD GOVERNMENT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD

The allotment to the appellant, who received the transfer of property in respect of the vacancy in his possession, had claimed that it had obtained the provisions of Sections 18, 18A and 43 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Administration of Evacuity Property Act, 1957. The land has been acquired in return. Land acquired by the government for the supporters of the road safety of the Iwaki property which was fully authorized under Sections 18A (2) and 43 (6) of the AJK Property Administration Act, 1957. So that they can move on to the originality or a question. Otherwise, the vacancy allotment, after taking into account the relevant facts, it was concluded that the allotment of land for the dispute in favor of the appellant was forfeited and that he was entitled to receive the result of the transfer of the rights of favor. Which had jurisdiction. In this case, the High Court or the Supreme Court cannot fall into its discretionary jurisdiction. famous supreme court advocate from Khairpur Nathan Shah lawyer