XEN, HIGHWAYS, MIRPUR versus MAQSOOD AHMAD, OVERSEER, ROADS DIVISION, MIRPUR
Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act 1975 Section 4 Retaining Written Request for Sections 42 and 44 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (1974 VIII of 1974), the practice of civil servant charged in writ petition Their exchange order was Malala. The reason for this is that during the two years of his employment, he was granted the application by the High Court nine times and issued a previous stabilization order. One of the terms and conditions of service was the verification transfer, which had exclusive jurisdiction over the service tribunal and the High Court had no jurisdiction. Although the case was highly unusual for a civil servant to repeatedly exchange, the fact would not remove jurisdiction from the service tribunal until the bead's orders could be challenged before the Service Tribunal High Court. There was an error entering the petition at a regular hearing. The court had also set aside the order of issuing a steel order of the High Court in the appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Gilgit lawyer