Find a Lawyer

ZAINIB versus ALIF NOOR

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 In the dispute between the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), the declaration of customs suit in Article 42 inheritance, the original owner of the land died during a period when customs prevailed in Kashmir and his Varies about the land excluded. It was during this period that their three daughters were approved as owners of limited ownership when the disputed land conversion was approved in favor of the suicide bomber / detainee and said that the affiliates had sold the land against the landowner. Was transferred through a contract and gift acts, the daughters of the deceased filed a declaration against the change. And the trial court, in the trial court's decision, claimed that the deceased / all three daughters were entitled to 2/3 share in the suit land decision and the order passed by the trial court was upheld by the appellate courts. But the High Court upheld the second appeal, the amended judgment, and the ruling that the two widows of the latter were also entitled to their respective shares. One of the three daughters of the deceased was married when customs were common in the village of Mutafi, while the remaining two daughters of the deceased were divorced, in which case it is said that the two daughters of the victim were Muslim. The person would go under the law, but the third daughter, who was married during that period, would probably want to lose the property of her late father, who has remarried during the traditional period. The heirs of the ex-deceased husband will be deprived. The two daughters of the expected High Court, in the circumstances, have to calculate and determine the parties' share. family advocate from Domeli lawyer