Section 42 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974, was not included in the leave petition for appeal nor a new point relating to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in a brief statement. That could allow a point of view. If the root of the case was first raised during the arguments, permission was sought and justified where the appellant did not seek such permission and on this new evidence it is entitled, The Supreme Court refused. Allow to raise the point that was not a point to go to the root of the case
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
