Find a Lawyer

AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR versus MIR MUHAMMAD NASEER

Articles 31 (4), 42 and 44 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974, Section 4 Notification Dates 21 11 1997 and 23 12 1997 Opening of new educational institutions and increasing tuition fees And tax discrimination whether the tuition fee tax government opened some new educational institutions through notification and said that the tuition fees payable by students of educational institutions were challenged before the High Court in a constitutional petition in which it was alleged. That the fees under section 31 (4) are taxed. The Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974 can be applied only by the Legislative Assembly, nor did the High Court, through an executive action, accept the constitutional request, concluding that the fees received from the students. There is a tax because it is said that no part of the fee was necessarily held for service. Return those who were to be recovered The Hedity High Court had failed to note the fact that only students who received tuition fees were paid from students in educational institutions. Was doing and getting education in return was required to be taxed for a tax by a governmental authority. There was a public purpose and there was no payment for a specific service provided which was a quid pro in relation to the fee which meant for something while it was absent in the tax, not just the payment of the fee as quaid pro But his absence was essentially a hindrance because the tuition fee was to be paid by a person who paid inheritance advocates near Kech lawyer