ALTAF versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/307/34 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), 5 337 [(as in lieu of the Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Ordinance (XII of 1993))) Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI) of 1979), the testimony of section 17 (3) was supported by credible witnesses supporting Alibi presented by the trial, the High Court accepted Alibi's request stating that the prosecution's witnesses Tried to involve an innocent person. The animosity was already in place, and the quality of the evidence presented by the prosecution was intriguing and contradictory and the statements of the prosecution witnesses were not supported by any independent sources, and, on the contrary, the statements of some bar members The statements were falsified. In the court where the alleged incident took place, there was contradiction between the inspection memo and the statement of counsel regarding the recovery of the vacancy of the crime. The accused appeared in the FIR, but was not shown to be armed and the complainant was not present He was on legal matters and the other two eyewitnesses were his servants, saying that the witnesses were proved to be untrustworthy because Albi's plea raised by the defendants was supported by credible evidence that the statements of the prosecution witnesses were false. Independent evidence was available, but was not examined and the injured witnesses in the prosecution They were not examined, when their statements could not be relied upon. Trial court's decision to set aside independent evidence on the basis of such incredible evidence
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Lawrence pur lawyer