Find a Lawyer

TANVIR ARIF versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Sections 2 (j), 7 and 17 of the Sindh Wildlife Protection Ordinance 1972? Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 ??? Constitutional application ??? Safe Animal Hunting ??? Addressing the Chief of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Protocol addressed to the Provincial Chief Secretary, said that a prominent person in the area mentioned in the letter has been allocated for hunting for Hobara bastards during the relevant hunting season? ??? Protection Ordinance, 1972 ??? The Hobara Bastards were considered protected animals under the Second Schedule to the Sindh Wildlife Protection Ordinance 1972 under Sec 2 (J) and could their victim be punished under Section 17 of the said Ordinance? The targets, motives for hunting by powers for exotic mourners were in violation of the Sindh Wildlife Protection Ordinance 1972 and the authorities were instructed to refrain from working under a license? ??? The High Court decision was binding. All persons, including the respondents, but the authorities issued a letter declaring that they allow hunting of Hobara bastards that would otherwise be animal-safe? At the Deputy Attorney's Assurance? General that in future, the authorities will be careful that the orders of the courts will be respected and the High Court, in violation of its order by the relevant authorities, in very strict terms of the letter and spirit, Any action was taken against the hope that such actions would not be repeated in the future? ??? After the expiration of the license period under which the hunting order was ordered, the constitutional application was dismissed. ask a advocate free from Shogram lawyer