Find a Lawyer

MUZAITTR KHAN versus HASSAN DIN

Under the Rules of Coordination Discovery Intervention of the Rules of Civil Code, 1908, Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the courts having the right to own property with the two courts, without considering the documentary evidence or considering the real issue arising out of wrongdoing. Without it, both courts rely on entries. Specific jamboree, the entries where the plaintiffs' ownership was supported, but as the property / hawala being present, there was no mention of the same defense claimant that the mansion question was not actually located in the area adjoining the khasra number. ? The question of title by the courts can be resolved by documentary evidence, while on record it does not support the claim of the plaintiff, while interference with the finding of conciliation cannot be denied in the jurisdiction where it is based on the evidence. Misinterpretation was based on misinterpretation, not reading evidence. Significant evidence or reasoning error was encountered n The specific measles number for the determination was the location of the mansion for which the commission should have been determined by the court to determine whether it was located in the measles number which the claimants claimed. Source or was in the measles number that was identified by the defendants, the case was remanded to the District Judge. Upon receipt of the report, the Haveli District Judge will decide the case on merit as per the law, directing some Tehsildars to appoint a commission to determine the place. property advocates from Kallur Kot lawyer