Find a Lawyer

AHMAD YAR versus RAJAB KHAN

The West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the conclusions of the two courts under section 15 transfer / plaintiff filed a declaration on the basis that it was in the interest of the respondents / defendants. Husband of And since the inheritance change was in favor of the defendant / defendant except the defendant / plaintiff, and the illegal trial court dismissed the case and before the lower appellate court met the same fate. ? Applicant / Plaintiff was unable to establish its performance Rel Reliance with Respondent in the interest of the Respondents / Defendants was placed in the interest of the respondents / respondents by the petitioner / Plaintiff's sister statement. When there was such a statement before the impact of the tax related assets, there was no reason why the applicant / plaintiff assisted as such a woman was not inspected and the decision based on her evidence was canceled. The appeal was not filed by the Revenue Party, therefore, the results obtained with the two courts were interrupted. Was there for, deleted the situation was under review immigration advocate from FR Kohat lawyer