Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TARIQ PIRZADA versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Office Delegation Ombudsman (Ombudsman) Order 1983 Establishment of Art 9 and 32 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Requesting the representation of President Pakistan against the recommendation of the Federal Ombudsman was requested to appoint him in his post of election. Please. After thoroughly reviewing the applicant's complaint through the respondent, the applicant approached the Federal Ombudsman to resolve his complaint, recommending that the applicant consider the appointment of his preferred authority. , Against which the recommendation will be represented before the President of Pakistan. The content and the president accepted the federal representation through a non-speaking order, a decisive accuracy order passed by the president that there was no indication that the president had put his conscious judicial mind on the facts of the matter, The status of President, Approved, and Order of Order indicates that it operates. The legislature did not intend to impose Article 32 of the Counter-Federal Ombudsman Order, 1983, for the purpose of establishing the Office of 1983, that the representation filed before the President of Pakistan, which included the valuable rights of the parties. They should or should be dealt with precisely by the President. They were disposed of by writing only two lines and that too, in the absence of the party, there should be a bid order approved by the President, which includes reasons for support and the application of a conscious judicial mind by the President. Logical order given. The President cannot be allowed to use the State without a conscious judicial mind so that the valuable right of the applicant is abolished. list of supreme court advocates from Quaidabad lawyer