Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NADEEM versus UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY

Amended by the Chancellor of the Department of Engineering and Technology, R41 (2) for the University of Engineering and Technology Act 1974 section 14 (3) 1998, as amended by the Vice-Chancellor of Section 14 (3), University of Engineering and Technology (Lahore). )) Act, 1974] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The educational institution constitutional application procedure and procedure for admission to BSc Engineering was changed on the basis of amendments. The Vice-Chancellor of the University was given the authority to amend any existing rule, subject to the powers of judicial review, which can always be examined by the courts. The general course of the amendment was that it should be initiated in the Academic Council and, if approved, should go to the Syndicate for approval. Following the request of the Academic Council's advice, the alternative syndicate could formulate its own rules / code of conduct, no such procedure was implemented in which R41 (2) of the prospectus was amended by the Vice-Chancellor Aggression about the use of emergency powers and then presented to the Syndicate and lastly seeking the approval of the Academic Council. Were not enough, nothing was brought in the record to show why the Academic Council could not be found to amend the existing rule, there is no emergency, which has led to the long standing admission by the Vice Chancellor. Who was actually the Principal Executive. As is important to the legislator, it was the responsibility of the Academic Council to legislate on the subject of admission, while the Principal Executive was required to provide the Academic Council due to any emergency. immigration advocates email from Khanbel lawyer