MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED versus RENT CONTROLLER/SUB-JUDGE, MUZAFFARABAD
Ordinances 4, 14 (2) (i) and 21 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Rental Restriction Act 1986, the order to withdraw the non-payment of rent arrears for sections 42 and 44, VIII of 1974 Jurisdiction to Implement The High Court Rent Controller dismisses the tenant's request for a fair rent accepted eviction request from the landlord due to non-payment of rent arrears by the tenant and with the execution request The landlord ordered the landlord to be fired, filed a rent increase and the rent controller accepts the request. The landlord ordered the tenants to submit their rent arrears at the rate of increase. Upon filing a constitutional petition against the rent controller's order, the High Court obtained a remand to the rental controller to decide whether the landlord is entitled to a rent increase and whether the landlord is entitled to receive an increased rent with the landlord. Effect of effective rent control by a fixed date after rejecting a tenant's request by ordering the tenant to be removed after fixing the tenant and accepting the landlord's removal request, he became a factsuit. , But the High Court failed to note that fact and became a fanatics outlaw The controller was remanded to it, the order had to be executed and nothing could be added to it, nor could the rental controller and the HC be modified or modified in any of its terms. Therefore, using the constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court sought the expulsion in accordance with its terms.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
