Find a Lawyer

HALCROW-ULG, ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, PAT FEEDER CANAL REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, WAPDA versus

Sections 15 and 17 of the Wages Payment Act 1936 and the Workers' Compensation Act (VII of 1923), Section 20 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Sanding Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 2 (i) and Section Oz 10 (c). ) & 12 Constitution of Pakistan, (1973), Article 199 Controversial Application Exemption Leave, Payment of Authority Powers, Grantees and Bonus Payment Awards under the Wages Act, 1936, were former employees of applicants, separate applications Filed Under Section 15, Salary Payment Act, 1936, in which they claimed unpaid leave, grants, bonuses and delayed payment of wages, the employees were asked to question the authority's jurisdiction over merit. But it was also objected to the payment of wages. Act, 1936, if the applicant will be satisfied that he was a "laborer" described under the Factories Act, 1934, or that he worked or was in the establishment of the Pakistan Railway, his salary in Syria. It was less than Rs 3,000, but he said that in the case of former employees, there were three elements shortage as his salary was more than Rs 4,000, and in the various capacities of the officers under section Oz 10 (c). Getting rid of bonuses and gains. The West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, and particularly acceptable only to the workers, provided no evidence from the employees that they were working in the industrial or commercial establishment. In the absence of such evidence, the employees have the jurisdiction to use the Commissioner's ability under the Workers' Compensation Act, 1923. property advocates from Multan lawyer