Find a Lawyer

MOHABAT versus STATE

Complainant in the Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 526 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 case transfer case, alleged that the accused community's Nicamord was pressurizing the complainant. And, upon refusing, he was told that the judge before whom the case was pending was on good terms with the accused. Further, it was alleged that Nickmerd was also seen coming out of the trial judge's complainant's retirement room, in support of such allegations, in which he admitted his personal statement to the prosecuting judge. His commenters denied the complainant's allegations, saying that the complainant had falsely accused the trial judge of harassing the trial judge so that the complainant's own choice could come to fruition and the complainant's mind I can express appreciation and no clear indication can be supported. Because the complainant did not disclose the name of Nickmard who contacted her for settlement, but there is a possibility that the complainant has a mind. When in the comments, the trial judge stated that the complainant had moved the transfer request to obtain his choice, the trial judge's mind could also be affected by such an impression, so that the complainant's mind could be trusted. Restored, though concerns about the fact that prejudice may well be established in the minds of the trial judge, the complainant's request for transfer is entitled to permission. ask a advocate free from Jaranwala lawyer