MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 561 Sindh Crimes Control Act (IV of 1975), Section 14/4 Accused in the report submitted by the police against the accused, vague and clean-blooded accused of the murder case The reference was made in reference to. There was no nexus from section 14/4 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975 as the accused along with other accomplices were acquitted of murder in this case, the police report did not present any recent case against the accused. Nor was it disclosed why the prosecution was registered against the accused, there was no description of the alleged acts of the accused, nor was the timing and commission of such proceedings. The place was given in which it was quoted from the witnesses that all the policemen were there and not a single free or private The denial was not cited as a witness. The report of the accused filed by the police against the accused was lacking material details. Cases against the accused, especially when the provisions of sections 4, 5 and 6 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975 were not complied with pending proceedings against the accused were dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Kharan lawyer