Find a Lawyer

NASIR JAVED versus KAZIM ALI

Sections 497 (5) and 498 of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 342, 337 F, 337 F (v), 337 D [in lieu of the Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Ordinance (XII of 1993)] The bail, cancellation medical evidence as well as the contents of the application bail filed by the defendant in which he claimed that he acted in self-defense, resulted in injuries to the complainant, the complainant alleged. There was considerable support that she was abused and beaten. And they also ordered the bite of the dogs that the court in connection with the advance bailout revealed that the court had failed to consider the rules of advance bail, the defendants could not be satisfied with the conditions of the accused for their required arrest. The alleged plea of Mula's accomplices was also ignored in reality. That is, the FIR was lodged after the complainant was released from the hospital and the accused issued the order for anticipatory bail, two days after the complainant filed the FIR through the court. Had applied for. And the bailout was triggered by the fact that the discretion in making advance guarantees was not completely baseless or baseless, and there is a difference between the principles of pre-arrest bail approval and post-arrest bail approval. Not suitable for bail, while approving the order bail, the High Court allowed the complainant's request to cancel the bail with the instruction to allow the accused himself in proper custody. ask a advocate free from Orakzai lawyer