WALI DAD versus TASNEEM KAUSAR
Section 5 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), 11 marriages in which 118 entries were submitted to the husband by the husband in connection with the declaration of transfer of the property to the dower, in the confession of the claim by the husband's uncle. In question because of the transfer after the wife divorced by her husband. The appellant claims that in return the property claims that he did not come to the witness room to respond to the plaintiff's (husband's) allegations of conspiracy with her husband and that he had taken her basic ingredients. And was expelled. It has been claimed that the transfers were lost in exchange for the value of the notice, the appellant could not give evidence of a firm inquiry before the alleged exchange and, on the contrary, during the trial of the plaintiff, the first appellate court was exchanged, Thus, he did not commit any error. The law did not guarantee any interference with the unidentified decision in deciding the plaintiff's case
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Ghuzdar lawyer