SHAFIQAN BIBI versus SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE/JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, OKARA
Section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and Schedule to Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Returns / Return of Benefits ??? Rehabilitation paid by husband to wife Sue was ordered to dissolve marriage suit on dissolution of marriage on the basis of khula - with the condition that it was decided that the wife be able to claim dower and care in lieu of khola. There would be no \ jurisdictional \ verifiable verdict and the Family Court injunction. Valid in issuing a conditional return on the same suit for the recovery of the Dover, however, after the verdict is reached, the wife will have to withdraw from the decree dissolving the marriage on the basis of khola, however, This claim was made through a claim from There is no benefit received by the husband from the wife and, therefore, is not eligible to be returned in the case of Khulla, because the husband was obliged to keep his wife as long as he remained in marriage. It was entitled to recover according to the decree passed in the restitution case, which was not challenged by the trial court's decree to dissolve the marriage on the basis of maintenance, to the extent of withdrawal from the maintenance allowance claim. Therefore, it was declared with no legal authority nor any legal effect
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Nilore lawyer