Find a Lawyer

STATE versus BENAZIR BHUTTO

Sections 15 and 10 of the Accountability Act 1997, where the Accountability Ordinance (II of 1998) is amended] Rules, 1973, R3 (1) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Sections 154, 172, 173 , 265 K & Chief Accountability Commissioner After considering the additional reference to the nature of the Investigation Officer's supplemental reference, 561 proceedings were cited and proceedings proceeded in continuation of the interim reference received by the Chief Accountability Commissioner. has been. The amendment ordinance, ie the Accountability Ordinance in 1997, long before the issuance of the 1998 ordinance, when reports were submitted by the Comptroller Bureau following the issuance of the said ordinance. 154, cannot be considered a report under CR PC. Similarly, the report of the Bureau of Accounts was submitted after the declaration of the said RD. The nonsense cannot be considered as an FIR and so will be treated with the report under 5 53, giving the former Chief Accountability Commissioner the effect that the CRPC amendment would have in nature. Cannot be granted while referring to the High Court under Section 15 (1). The Accountability Act, 1997 closed the Investigation Officer's report and the evidence submitted by it, which for the first time, was largely restricted to the rule of law, 1973, although it was prepared under Article 99 of the Constitution. Was done, but still cannot be. After providing the Chief Accountable Commissioner's inquiry, investigation, and court specific and comprehensive procedures for trial proceedings, the word of caution Act 1997 was preferred, with no scope for the application of the rules business. ? Under the Accountability Act, 1997, 1973 pakistani advocates Shujabad lawyer