IMDAD HUSSAIN versus THE STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 341, 347 and 365A / 395/149 Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), Section 423 FIR filing was fully explained in the alleged contradictions between the FIRs and the abduction. The deployment of the cars was not of a nature that would cast serious doubt on the truth of the abductor's statement, claiming that he was not subjected to any identification parade and was first identified in court by the abductor. Was made because the accused's confession was wrong because he was accused of arresting the accused presented to the court. It was pointed out that the accused was arrested by the abductor along with the police party and pointed out that the accused was also a person who was guarding him when the abductor / victim was identified. If the accused was arrested then the accused was made a judicial confession on record and the evidence has proved that the accused was guilty of the offense under 5 34 347, the PPC court granted him immunity under c 423 in immunity. One, the CRPC set aside the conviction and sentence of the accused found under Section 6565A, PPC and converted it into one under the same 347, PPC.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Rabwah lawyer