Find a Lawyer

ALI HASSAN versus STATE

Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Sections 4040 & 9439 (XLV of 1860), Section 302 The accused was illiterate to call back the prosecution's witnesses for further investigation and was sentenced to trial in a murder trial. Was facing a trial court appointed by the trial court to advise on state expenditures. The appointment was not made with his consent, nor did he ask him to instruct that the resulting important and important questions were not put before the prosecution's witnesses who were required to clarify the truth under 540. The only key is the PC, no doubt, was arbitrary, but the discretion had to be dealt with judiciously and not arbitrarily and technical technical skills for the administration of justice should be avoided as a result of the request for review. I was allowed to accept the accused's petition under 540 540, CRPC re-examined the trial court Was instructed with the verse. Further investigation witnesses by prosecutor's accused newly appointed advocate immigration advocate from Bhimbar lawyer